US 29 Western Bypass Chutzpah

By. Neil Williamson, President

Only in Charlottesville will you find local officials with the chutzpah to make additional funding “requests” when presented with statewide funding for a National 29 logo

The Charlottesville Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is poised to send a letter to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) requesting funding for a laundry list of local projects that will help the MPO “understand the context” in which they are voting for or against the US 29 Western Bypass.

As Charlottesville Tomorrow reported:

After the public hearing, the MPO agreed to send a letter to the CTB explaining the conditions under which it will support a bypass. . . .

“We don’t know how much money there is or where it will be coming from,” [Supervisor Duane] Snow said. “This is just a letter to say what we want and what we expect.”

The CTB is scheduled to meet in Richmond on Wednesday of this week and as of this writing (Monday morning) the MPO letter has not yet been finalized.  The discussion at the MPO meeting on Thursday included the following “requests”:

  1. Full funding for the US 29 Western Bypass
  2. A completed design of the US 29 Western Bypass northern terminus, which will include public participation of Albemarle County citizens, particularly Forest Lakes and Hollymead citizens
  3. Full funding for the widening of US 29 between Polo Grounds Road and Hollymead Town Center
  4. Full funding for conceptual design of Berkmar Drive Extended
  5. Full funding for design and construction of a shared use (Bypass/Berkmar Extended) bridge over the Rivanna River
  6. Full funding of the US 29/250 Bypass additional entrance rams and interchange improvements (commonly refereed to as the “Best Buy ramp” projects
  7. Full funding of Hillsdale Drive Extended (being designed by the City of Charlottesville)
  8. Funding for the Belmont Bridge Replacement in the City moved forward from fiscal year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2014
  9. Funding for extension of public transit service to Hollymead Town Center
  10. A CTB resolution indicating that Charlottesville and Albemarle transportation projects currently in the MPO Transportation Improvement Program will have no funding reductions as a result of the US 29 Western Bypass.

There was also significant discussion of requesting funding for the Northtown Trail  the first continuous inter-jurisdictional biking facility in the Charlottesville/Albemarle urbanized area. The consensus at the meeting seemed to be not to request this additional funding.

The Free Enterprise Forum is concerned this list of “requests” is being designed as a pretext to deny approval of the Western Bypass by the MPO.   Of the ten items on the list, numbers 7, 8 and 9 seem only tangentially related to the US 29 Western Bypass and might be perceived by some as political horse trading.

The MPO is now in a most interesting dance with the CTB.  The CTB will receive a letter of “requests” some time after Noon on Monday and the MPO expects them to have decisions in their Wednesday meeting.  The CTB may  not be able to address all the issues raised in the letter as a part of their July meeting.  They may chose to take action on some of the items or withhold action until all can be addressed.

If they defer, this would allow the MPO to hold its second public hearing on July 27th but postpone their action until such a time that the CTB answers all their “requests”.

In the Charlottesville Tomorrow article Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission (TJPDC)  Executive Director Stephen Williams seemed to anticipate this eventuality when:

Williams said there is a chance the CTB will not be able to reach agreement at its meeting next week as to how  to reallocate money from other projects. That would mean the MPO could not vote to amend the TIP at the July 27 public hearing.

With the CTB not scheduled to meet in August, the next opportunity for action is their September 21st meeting.  If such a scenario plays out, it would more than likely push any MPO action into October.

While generally appreciative of the sloth’s pace of most government action, Governor McDonnell’s transportation funding priorities do have a sense of urgency. The Free Enterprise Forum hopes that the lengthy, thoughtful MPO “Wish List” doesn’t result in these much needed statewide transportation dollars going to into another, perhaps more receptive community.

Respectfully submitted,

Neil Williamson


20070731williamson Neil Williamson is the President of The Free Enterprise Forum, a privately funded public policy organization covering the City of Charlottesville as well as Albemarle, Greene, Fluvanna, Louisa and Nelson County.  For more information visit the website


5 responses

  1. Totally Agree! Either this a gross overreach, or there is serious pressure being brought to bear. Stephen Williams wants delay (he’s against the bypass) Supv Rooker wants delay (ditto) Rooker also tried to insert language to give Albemarle Supervisors VETO power over the design of the northern terminus – which after the elections (see above:delay…) could allow a future board to kill the project by not approving the design. They have to: Do it NOW! – Get it to the State level and out of the hands of the local politicians – and get the CTB to approve this thing before they screw it up forever!

  2. Let me take another whack at this: Their “Bargaining Position” is roughly akin to holding a gun to your own head and threatening to shoot unless someone gives you all their money….. The 3 Stooges are alive and well and living in Albemarle – (or perhaps living in denial……)

  3. I think they should ask for a pony while they’re at it.

    Also, VDOT should require Albermarle and Cville to reimburse the taxpayers for all previous costs if the county or city deep-six this.

  4. […] of the  Charlottesville Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO).   After our blog post regarding the letter, one commenter on the Free Enterprise Forum blog opined “I am surprised they […]

  5. […] like to see fully funded.  The letter, which the Free Enterprise Forum described as showing Chutzpah, was very careful not to make the funding of these projects as demands: We recognize that […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: