Is This The End of The Road?

By. Neil Williamson, President

In July 2011, after the Charlottesville Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) voted 3-2 to move forward with the Western Bypass, I wrote a post that quoted Sir Winston Churchill that this was not the beginning of the end but the end of the beginning.  The results of today’s (3/19) Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) meeting provide a fitting bookend as it now looks like the beginning of the end of the Western Bypass.

The audience in the Richmond auditorium featured many familiar faces from Albemarle and Charlottesville including four members of the Board of Supervisors as well as Albemarle County Executive Tom Foley.  [Considering it was a transportation meeting, I wonder if we should have done a better job car pooling-NW]

Last month, Virginia Transportation Secretary Aubrey Layne selected former VDOT Commissioner Phillip Schucet to facilitate a short term Advisory Panel to evaluate what to do about the congestion issues on US29.  The very specific charge for the advisory panel requires the process to be transparent and to work with in the economic constraints of the $200 Million dollars the CTB already allocated to the Western Bypass.  In addition, any solution, or package of solutions, must be able to be constructed (or significant progress accomplished) in the three and a half years left in the current administration.  Layne was also clear in the charge that doing nothing was not an option.  The results of the group’s work are scheduled to be presented at the May 14th meeting of the CTB.

One CTB member, Mark Peake of Lynchburg asked the question directly, “Would this group consider any bypass solutions?”.  Schucet answered the question directly “No”.

Another CTB member, William Fralin of Salem asked the Secretary if the bypass was abandoned and the land sold back would those funds be available to the US29 Corridor in addition to the $200 Million?  Layne was appropriately deferential indicating that decision could not be made until the recommendation came forward and any funds to be reprogrammed would be a decision for the CTB.

Aubrey Layne photo credit VDOT

Transportation Secretary Aubrey Layne

The advisory panel composition was a concern for CTB member Alison DeTuncq of Charlottesville who questioned why Greene County, Culpeper County and other localities were not included in the panel.  [The Free Enterprise Forum did find the inclusion of the Southern Environmental Law Center interesting] Schucet indicated that there were a number of conversations regarding the number of people to be on the panel.  At one point it was five at another twenty.  He believed the size was now appropriate.  Layne indicated these were the localities that had been most engaged in the conversations thus far.

So the question remains.  ‘Is this the end of the road?’

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) February 18th letter indicated the twenty years of delay brought the original scope and purpose of the road into question.  The charge to the advisory panel has eliminated the consideration of any bypass at this time. 

My friend, and longtime bypass opponent, Jeff Werner of the Piedmont Environmental Council was quoted on Twitter this week saying  that he would believe the Western Bypass is dead when the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) sells back the right of way.  I tend to agree this will be an instructive and rather objective metric. 

Considering the Advisory Panel’s prescriptive charge and the tenor of the CTB’s discussion this afternoon in Richmond, if this is not the end of the road, it is in sight.

Respectfully submitted,

Neil Williamson


20070731williamson Neil Williamson is the President of The Free Enterprise Forum, a privately funded public policy organization covering the City of Charlottesville as well as Albemarle, Greene, Fluvanna, Louisa and Nelson County.  For more information visit the website

Photo Credit: VDOT


5 responses

  1. Not saying this is what I necessarily favor but listen to me now and believe me later, I bet what we end up with (eventually) is a combo of Eastern Bypass starting somewhere up in Greene (maybe Madison) and connecting to 64, PLUS an ugly, Gainesville-style overpass in the Hydraulic Rd area dumping local traffic onto 250 West pretty much in the same spot as the current proposed bypass. Unless VDOT plans to buy out rich folks and bulldoze affluent neighborhoods, I don’t see any other possible routes east or west. Granted, any plan will likely take another two decades so maybe we’ll be driving hovercraft by then and won’t need new roads!

  2. Layne is also stopping mobilization payments on the US 460 connector in Prince George until environmental issues are resolved. ( $300,000,000 of taxpayer money has been spent there on a road that hasn’t even begun construction.) Personally, I am glad to see that there is someone in the position who wants to manage effective use of taxpayer dollars to create roads that are efficient and accomplish desired objectives. Neil, we may just end up with a road that is less expensive and moves the traffic better, which is all some of us who don’t like this outmoded design have been asking for. It’s not a no-growth issue but rather one of spending dollars YOU AND I send to Richmond on a road that works well.

    1. Ms. Pape brings up an intriguing but potentially deceptive qualifier. There is no doubt about what’s been cast “outmode.” Nevertheless, such does not offer exceptional charge (or hope) to revise (in the broadest sense what’s been decreed) “outmoded.” Yes I would agree with her no matter how the majority is sliced and diced up or out, an inexpensive and fluidly traffic moving route is all everyone’s ever pleaded for. However to (no matter how much politely) dismiss growth inextricably (local or statewide) from any of this only pushes the initial base contention forward.

      Again, watch the hand of anti-growth sentiment while your eye is taken off the deference to efficient effective “design,” conveniently under the catchy redistrubutive term of “spending dollars.” How better to alleviate and avoid not being another Fairfax and paying it forward to one mixing bowl after another (no thanks Places 29), or far worse the future (Insert an even digit number here)-64 Beltway. Of course, the all seeing and all knowing anti-road / ruthless traffic-calming sentimentists wouldn’t permit such. Yeah, welcome to the end of the beginning of YOUR NO FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF TAX DOLLARS AT WORK HERE.

  3. Let’s see, no bypass and any overpass(es) will face the same opposition once actual planning starts. It’s wishful thinking that the problems will be solved with simple changes, the die was cast when Albermarle allowed commercial growth up 29N without planning for roads.

    So now we wait for a fairy to wave a wand and make something happen that doesn’t affect anyone’s property values … .

    and it’s still not too late to also ask for a pony.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: